Hunger S. Dumbson
- Bongo Journalist-

Telling the awful truth in blunt language

Name:
Location: United States

Friday, June 30, 2006

Let's deny America any way possible

Ever since artist Joe Shuster and writer Jerry Siegel created the granddaddy of all comic book icons in 1932, Superman has fought valiantly to preserve "truth, justice and the American way." Whether kicking Nazi ass on the radio in the '40s or wrapping himself in the Stars and Stripes on TV during the Cold War or even rescuing the White House's flag as his final feat in "Superman II," the Krypton-born, Smallville-raised Ubermensch always has been steeped in unmistakable U.S. symbolism.

But in the latest film incarnation, scribes Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris sought to downplay Superman's long-standing patriot act. With one brief line uttered by actor Frank Langella, the caped superhero's mission transformed from "truth, justice and the American way" to "truth, justice and all that stuff."
Does that surprise you? It shouldn't. Just more of Hollywood's typical anti-American bullshit. That's why I no long patronize their offerings.

Thursday, June 29, 2006

The Sup-REAM Court

The Supreme Court, or at least those black-robbed ninnies on the leftist side, might as well rename themselves the Sup-REAM Court after the reaming they gave America and the Administration on the Gitmo trial process. I don't know whether those five liberal bastards are on the payroll of the New York Times or al-Qaeda itself, but they are doing everything in their power to destroy us.

The Court found that Bush cannot on his own order military trials for those evil head-cutting sons of bitches now contained at Gitmo, but that they must be afforded all the same constitutional safeguards as the rest of us--never mind that these folks were captured on foreign battlefields and haven't set foot on American soil. I suppose the idea is to give them trials in US federal court and call in soldiers from the battlefield to testify against them. What are these ignorant motherfuckers drinking?

More scary, SCOTUS ruled that the Geneva Convention applies to these maniacs. Never mind that they are members of no recognized military organization or signatory, wear no uniforms, target civilians and in no way fit the definition of a standard army which is bound by rules, however much those rules may be ignored or bent.

The good news to all this is that the idiots didn't order all the murdering bastards released. And too, apparently Congress can pass legislation to empower the president to order military trials; I'd be willing to bet the ACLU or some so-called "human rights organization" (you know, the ones who raised such a fuss when our two soldiers were recently slaughtered) will challenge any such law passed, however. These fuckers want Bush to fail and if it takes anything detrimental to America to do it that's OK, too.

And wouldn't you know that most Democrats are applauding the Court's misguided action. The Court has upheld the rights of these poor, unfortunate murdering sons of bitches. Oh, the terrorists knew their money was being tracked anyway, one old Democrat congressional bag said.

Sure they did, but they didn't know the methodology, the exact way it was tracked. Now they do and no doubt they will find ways to get around it.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Those white dudes have no rhythm

Barack Obama: "Nothing is more transparent than inauthentic expressions of faith: the politician who shows up at a black church around election time and claps off rhythm to the gospel choir."
Hey man, that was Al Gore!

Monday, June 26, 2006

NYT - Traitors in our midst

I read on one blog where someone couldn't imagine what would possess the New York Times to reveal classified information that greatly aided our enemies. I suppose in a perfect world, and in an earlier time, such would be hard to imagine.

I have no such difficulty. I understand that the Times hates George W. Bush so vehemently that any act it can accomplish to harm him in any way is acceptable--even if it damages the nation as a whole. And I understand that the Time's loss of circulation and readership (and ad revenue) would drive them to try anything to gain readership.

Of course, none of those reasons are good enough to place the lives of Americans in jeopardy, and that's exactly what they have done. They may use that old "freedom of the press" cry as vindication, but it doesn't wash; the founding father gave the freedom of speech and press to the public, not to some institution that believes it is above the rest of us. There's nothing in the First Amendment that gives anyone the right to be traitors to their nation in the name of free speech and more especially not when dealing with forces would want to destroy our very way of life. It's total insanity, born out of greed and arrogance.

There have been some calls for the Justice Department to take legal action against not only those who reveal secret and classified information to news organizations, but to those news organizations who publish it. I believe that is justified in certain cases--not with "whistle-blowers" who are apprising the public of some misdeed or corruption, but with those who give information out of hatred and spite for the administration (or any other administration) that will harm the public welfare. These people need to be punished and severely at that.

The editor, the publisher and the reporters who presented the information to the public (and to al-Qaeda) are all traitors and should be treated as such. The death penalty would not be too good for them.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Ah, the "Rainbow" Family of peace

Sounds like a bunch of sixties wannabes that need their fucking head whipped with clubs, but the poor little chickenshit Forest Service was scared off. Suppose they were afraid they would offend some of the lefties.

Drop a napalm on the mofukas, that should do the trick.

Lefty high on snuff?

Is lefty Eleanor Clift a snuff addict?

Judging by the screen capture at left, the answer might be YES! She looks like she's on the front end of a massive "Garrett's Sweet" rush.

But then it could be that the old bag is just bored by her constant attempts to prop up a lot of lefty bullshit that won't fly. That's a problem a lot of moonbats seem to have nowadays, but alas, it doesn't stop them from filling the airwaves with their foolishness.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

OK, where are they?

I'm talking about all those human rights advocates. You know, the ones who believe America is evil because we put panties over some filthy murderer's head at Gitmo, or "humiliated" them in other ways. Those human rights folk really get upset when people are humiliated in any way, if you'll recall all the hell they have raised.

Unless it's American victims, that is. They don't even get excited when American troops are kidnapped, brutally tortured and executed, like the two young soldiers found today.

Serves us right, I suppose. Payback because America is an imperialistic nation that has thrown its weight around too much, shat on the little people and all those backward sons of bitches. We get what we deserve.

Wise up, people. You're not going to defeat this kind of filthy enemy playing nice with them, playing by the rules. It's either down and dirty or get the hell out of Dodge.

Monday, June 19, 2006

She chose the wrong religion

Had the young lady been a Muslim, she would have been allowed to give her address without having the microphone cut on her. It would have been politically incorrect and perhaps a slap at alternative religion to do that.

Jeez, can't things get much worse? Probably, and that's unfortunate.

Sunday, June 18, 2006

Huh? You didn't know?

Before 2001, the section of the U.S. criminal code under which the men were charged applied to those who operated money-transmitting businesses and knew they were doing so illegally. Under the Patriot Act, operators no longer have to know they are transmitting money illegally.

When has ignorance of the law ever been an excuse to break it? Never, I believe.

NYT promotes anything anti-God, America

The New York Times has a habit of doing long pieces on bullshit that doesn't serve American interests particularly well, especially when it comes to promoting the cult of Islam. It's amazing that they seem to despise the idea of a Christian God so much, and yet find so much to promote in Allah, the distorted concept of a Creator espoused by Muslims.

Calling the clerics and devotees depicted in this piece "moderates" doesn't mean much, when they don't choose to condemn the terrorists who they claim distort the words of their so-called holy book. However, they can find it in their hearts to make moral equals of collateral civilians deaths caused by American military actions and the kidnappings and murders performed by terrorists of their religion, although the one is merely an unfortunate accident and the other a planned and malignant scheme carried out by madmen.

What the NYT is doing is helping Islam recruit more people for their malignant religion, which is especially appealing to blacks, as many of them feel like outsiders to begin with. They hate the American system and are ready to throw in with anyone who hates it equally and wishes to see it destroyed.

Sadly, our government does little more than appease those who wish us all dead, on these shores at least. People are eventually going to have to get off this politically correct horse and take back control of our destiny before we reach a point where that is no longer possible.

Saturday, June 17, 2006

A word to the Health Police

If you don't like what's in the fucking food, DON'T EAT IT!

This is being tough?

In an extraordinary show of toughness against one of their own members, Democrats voted 99-58 Thursday evening to strip Rep. William Jefferson, a Democrat from New Orleans accused of accepting bribes, of his seat on the Ways and Means Committee. The vote allows Democrats to maintain that they do not tolerate impropriety, yet the sanction already has placed a strain on the caucus.

This is a dude who was caught with $90,000 in marked bribe money in his refrigerator and it takes someone tough to vote him off a committee? Christ, what did this writer (and the Democrats) use for brains?

You know what bothers me? The 58 voters who didn't see any reason to remove Jefferson from the committee. That's how tough Democrats are.

The article doesn't mention the Black Caucus specifically, but I suspect none of its members voted to expel Jefferson. And solely because he is black.

The Dixie Shits live up to name

"The entire country may disagree with me, but I don't understand the necessity for patriotism," Maines resumes, through gritted teeth. "Why do you have to be a patriot? About what? This land is our land? Why? You can like where you live and like your life, but as for loving the whole country…I don't see why people care about patriotism."

Natalie Maines may think she's being cool saying such things, and no doubt a lot of waterheads will still buy their music. But how about all those tour dates they had to cancel lately because of poor ticket sale? If "the entire country disagrees" with your position, and you rely on the country for a living, what good are you doing expressing it?

Those fickle anti-establishment types won't keep the Shits Chicks going forever. They will wind up a dusty little footnote in history, right where they belong.

Friday, June 16, 2006

It's better to be bald

Really, have you ever seen a worse comb-over in your life? And seriously, does this dude believe he's fooling anybody?

It's amazing the lengths a man will go to in order to avoid the appearance of a bald pate. Unfortunately, most of those lengths lead to something that is far more unsightly than a melon shining in the lights.

I submit that Mr. Groome shouldn't be worried about "What makes us Catholic." He'd be far better off wondering why in fuck do I do this to my head?

That's the real question.

Thursday, June 15, 2006

A new "Abu" to kill

The asshole at left is Abu Ayyub al-Masri, new replacement head-cutter for the recently deceased Zarkman. He looks like the kind of punk someone would pick on in gym class, although reportedly this picture is several years old.

Hopefully, our troops will be able to locate, and terminate, this prick before too long. The coalition has terrorists in Iraq on the run now, with all the raids and successes arising from the location and dispatch of Z-man, which led to the discovery of a cache of useful documents. They should keep the pressure on full steam, despite calls from Democrats to begin thinking about a withdrawal in the face of our recent successes and the establishment of a government.

Indeed, running now is the last thing we need to do. What we need are more troops to clean this situation up quickly, to stomp them into the dust while they are in disarray and reeling. I don't expect the administration to send more troops, however, not with elections coming up in November; it's a shame politics plays such a role in our military ventures, but it's a fact of life.

Aiding and abetting

Seems to me this falls under the heading of aiding and abetting criminals. Why aren't these people stopped by the law? They are helping people violate our laws, so it seems reasonable they could be arrested for it. And they should be.

Mush-mouth Murtha

Goodie. Big-mouthed Murtha may have to take the witness stand and reveal who told him Marines in Haditha were cold-blooded murderers. Bet he'll have a difficult time coming up with an answer to that question. Maybe he'll commit perjury and wind up with his old ass under a pen somewhere, that would be nice.

Iman Bush? I don't think so

This crazy "cleric" has suggest that Bush convert to Islam in order to put his soul at peace. What's the odds of that happening?

Slim to none, I'd estimate. I think he'd get a whole lot more peace of mind if he sent one of the Black Ops outfits out to swat this stupid old fly.

Poor old Dan

It seems CBS management has finally noticed that Rather is indeed brain-dead. It took them long enough.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Oh, those fickled Hollywood stars

I hope this doesn't mean Bono is deserting the War on AIDS for the National Clap Foundation.

Another idiotic John Kerry statement

"No matter how brave our soldiers are, no matter how valiant, no matter what their caring ... our soldiers cannot bring democracy to Iraq at the barrel of a gun," Kerry said Tuesday at a gathering of progressive Democrats.

I'll be damned. It's a good thing George Washington and his boys didn't know as much as Kerry, else we'd still be paying the British tea tax.

Is John Kerry really this stupid? If so, he not only doesn't need to be president, he doesn't even need to be a senator. Must be that tinfoil hat fucking up his mind...

The media is stuck on stupid

President Bush pulled a surprise trip to Iraq yesterday to greet new Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki face to face. We've also learned that special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has determined he doesn't have any reason to indict Karl Rove in connection with the Plame CIA leak. Add to that the recent justice administered to Zarqawi, and it has been a good past week for Bush.

So what does the press concentrate on during Bush's news conference today? Hell, they're still stuck on Abu Ghraib, the prison scandal from a couple years ago. You know, the one wherein those who put panties over some asshole's head or threatened the head-cutters with dogs have been tried by the military and put in jail.

The media also concentrated on Guantanamo and those poor victims of incarceration there, the ones who should be tried or turned loose--you know, like we tried all those soldiers taken prisoner during WW2. I don't know why we don't just turn them loose and give them their firearms and blades back; at least that would give us good justification to kill them in self-defense, because surely the first thing most would try to do is murder their liberators.

Idiots, fucking idiots! Period. They cannot find one silver lining for all the clouds, at least not if it involves GWB or the military or the real state of things in Iraq. The sad truth is, they hate Bush, the man who is trying to protect them, more than they hate the people who are trying to kill them.

It makes no sense at all, but I suppose hatred from that particular element of the Left is not supposed to make sense. Nothing else about that point of view does.

Poor Al Gore, big movie man

Professor Bob Carter of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University, in Australia gives what, for many Canadians, is a surprising assessment: "Gore's circumstantial arguments are so weak that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are commanding public attention."

But surely Carter is merely part of what most people regard as a tiny cadre of "climate change skeptics" who disagree with the "vast majority of scientists" Gore cites? No; Carter is one of hundreds of highly qualified non-governmental, non-industry, non-lobby group climate experts who contest the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are causing significant global climate change. "Climate experts" is the operative term here.

Why? Because what Gore's "majority of scientists" think is immaterial when only a very small fraction of them actually work in the climate field.
[Article]

For several years, Gore has been close to a certified nut case and this kind of thing doesn't do much to change that appearance. I suppose losing the election simply drove him over the edge and into some sort of fairly land where he actually believes his environmental horse shit.

Obviously, many qualified scientists don't.

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Hmmm, I thought ROVE was Bush's brain...

But guess I was wrong. After all, Time magazine knows everything--or at least everything that might tend to make Bush and/or Republicans, the military, and the United States, for that matter, look bad.

This was a given...

You had to know that someone (like CBS) would put forth the idea that Zarqawi was beaten to death by Americans after the bombing. Since such an allegation puts America, its troops and GWB in a bad light, they obviously would believe the word of some Iraqi neighbor of the former "safe house," who is no doubt a good Muslim incapable of telling a lie.

Let me say this: I don't give a damn if he was beaten to death. Indeed, if Zarqawi was alive enough to take a beating, they should have simply beheaded the son of a bitch like he would have done to any of them.

And another thing: I don't give a rat's ass if 30 or 300 prisoners at Gitmo have committed suicide, so stop telling us about the three that did. (They were probably beaten to death too, right CBS?) Fuck all the people who worry about the fate of this scum. You couldn't concoct a terrible enough end for them to equal what they deserve.

There really shouldn't be a Gitmo. But unlike all those idiots now calling for a closure of the facility and a release of the inmates, I wouldn't have had them there to begin with. Those captured with no intelligence value should have been executed on the spot. Those who had information should have been interrogated in clandestine locations and then summarily executed after the information was obtained by whatever means necessary.

Sound cruel and insane, I know, but then we're not fighting a normal enemy. These people aren't troops conscripted by the Nazis or the Emperor, or even Uncle Ho, caught and ready to call it quits and go home to mama. These terrorists intend to change our way of life. It's more of an obsession than a goal and they will never be happy until it is accomplished.

The only way to defeat them is to destroy them totally, because as long as they draw breath, there will be no peace from them.

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Explain this

If we listen to the MSM, a majority of Americans are opposed to the war in Iraq. Why is it then that the Army has again, and for the 12 consecutive month, met its recruiting goals?

I suppose one explanation could be that the media is distorting the polls and lying to us. That's obviously a safe assumption—remember all those exit polls during the last election? The results were doctored in an attempt to influence people who hadn't voted yet. It didn't work anymore than most of their other attempts to snow the public.

Let's face the facts: both major political parties today leave a lot to be desired. But in my estimation, Democrats (and especially that rabid left-wing variety that has seized control of the party) leave more to be desired than do Republicans. The Dems want to make the November elections about the "culture of corruption," but their own corruption has stifled that opportunity. (Maybe they should make William Jefferson Speaker of the House if they take control in November, and if he isn't in prison by then.) They believed they would use the corruption angle to wrest away corrupt Republican Duke Cunningham's seat in Southern California, after old Duke got 8 years in Slam City for more bribery than you can shake a big stick at.

They lost that opportunity, because they didn't understand that in that particular area just north of the Mexican border, illegal immigration is the real issue. It's wetbacks, stupid! But they don't have tenable positions on immigration or the war or practically anything else, so it's hard for them to make a good argument for their case, or at least an argument that is going to place them in the winning column with a majority of Americans.

What the Democrats do have a lot of are people like Murtha and Pelosi, Dean and Kerry and a host of others who destroy their chances every time they open their mouths. These people very frequently speak to the constituents that elect them time and again, but they never seem to realize that the enclaves of rabid leftist who vote for them don't exceed by far the limits of their jurisdictions. They wind up preaching to the choir and the rest of the congregation gets up and beats big feet for more sensible climes. And, screwed up as they sometimes are, Republicans represent that destination at the moment.

Make no mistake about it—I'm a big George W. Bush fan. I think at this particular moment in history he is perhaps the only man for the job. He's smarter than most of the people who call him dumb, he's got more real heart than all those bogus bleeding hearts who whine for the well-being of terrorists and head-cutters, and he has the balls to do what is necessary regardless of a media that have decided to destroy him at each and every opportunity. And he takes all that in good stride in a way few of us could—hell, if I were the president with all that clandestine resources at my disposal, many of those rabid, psycho critics would doubtless be "disappeared" in the night, never to be seen again.

Of course, the media view Bush as arrogant because he doesn't kiss their asses like they have become accustomed to expect. He doesn't care about their phony polls because he realizes that they are simply out to get him and he knows most Americans realize that too. He's not perfect by a long shot, but he's the best we could hope for at this time when our nation is under threat by devotees of a mindless religion whose stated goal is to convert, or destroy, everybody in the world.

Read the Koran, I didn't make that up. You become Muslim or you die, period. That's it.

Thursday, June 08, 2006

The bastard be gone!

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, otherwise known as a goat-raping, murdering son of a bitch, has busted the big middle of hell wide open, thanks to the U.S. military air action and two 500-pound bombs in his breakfast. We don't know if his favorite goat perished in the big blast, but if so then he had 72 virgin goats waiting for him when he arrived in the Pit of Hades shortly after the big BOOM! Have fun, Al!

It goes without saying that some on the Left are upset with this. Over at Dailycrumbkos, the notion has been expressed that the killing was simply for the purpose of taking the Haditha issue off the front pages. I suppose some of those wet-brains believe we've had al-Zarqawi stashed away somewhere and were just waiting for the proper media opportunity to stick him in a "safe house" (if this is "safe" give me dangerous!) and blow him up. I also suppose this was a plan concocted by the evil Karl Rove, with a mild assist by Dick Cheney and Rumsfeld playing the boards on the rebound.

According to one report I read, the father of Nick Berg, the American contractor murdered in Iraq a couple years ago, condemned the killing of the terrorist as more of Bush's retribution. This man's son's head was reportedly cut off by al-Zarqawi personally, so that should tell you just how insane some of the Left is in this country. Pitiful.

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

C'mon, admit it - you're a coward

Is that so hard to say, Lieutenant? You're a stinking coward, period. If you didn't have the balls to serve, you should have stayed on the porch with the little dogs.

As I understand it, missing movement during wartime can be a capital offense. If that's the case, then this dude should be tried and, if found guilty, executed. But he won't be, no. He'll get a slap on the wrist following which he will become a saint for the dailykos, move-on types. You know, a martyr like those misshapen idiots who strap bombs on themselves and kill in the name of a child molester called Muhammad.

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

What's it to be?

This should tell us for sure if Iran wants nuclear power for energy purposes, or has intentions of building nuclear bombs. In any case, it should open up the road to further sanctions if Iran refuses the offer.

I'm betting weapons is what they are after, so this proposal will go by the wayside. I'm not sure it's a good idea to make such offers to outlaw countries because it sets the stage for international extortion by any any number of despotic leaders.

Global warming - hogwash

See this column for a reality check. Al Gore has no doubt caused more atmospheric damage than his movie will ever correct. But who cares...after all, he IS Al Gore.

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Literary Fool

I saw John Updike on one of those Sunday morning political shows (the dwarf's program) this morning. I used to like Updike's books, but I don't think "Terrorist" is one I will be reading. Like most liberals, he has become a total nitwit. I must admit, that doesn't surprise me, because from that point of view there is nowhere else to go.

Friday, June 02, 2006

Where is it?

Are you one of the legions waiting breathlessly for Microsoft's Vista to ship?

Maybe you shouldn't be...

The prisons are filled with who??

Looking at the most wanted lists of L.A. and NYC, it's easy to see why we hear all that crap about minorities being "picked on" when it comes to law enforcement. Of course, if they were more law abiding, they likely wouldn't get "picked on" so much.

No doubt a great percentage of those folks are illegal aliens as well. It should be noted that they will trim your hedge and edge your lawn before slitting your throat and robbing you, however.

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Idiot alert! Idiot alert!

What would have happened had you said this? I'll tell you. The Secret Service would be all over your ass.

Why aren't they all over this idiot's ass?

More great news!

The mainstream media continutes to meltdown. Can't happen fast enough to suit some of us.

This doesn't surprise me

This poll by ABC says exactly what one might expect it to say: that most Americans don't believe members of congress are somehow holier than the rest of us. Indeed, if anything they're probably a few degrees more dishonest.